Showing posts with label Tanach. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tanach. Show all posts

Friday, October 7, 2022

Yom Kippur, 5783/2022 - Main D'var Torah (Daytime)

When I was 19 years old, I moved to the United States on my own. At the time, I mostly just felt super-excited about this new adventure, moving to New York City, straight into Manhattan, and attending two colleges at the same time, List College, the undergraduate program at the Jewish Theological Seminary, and Columbia University. It was just the most fabulous, wondrous, exhilarating experience I could ever have imagined. I arrived a week early, with just my mom accompanying me, and she helped me set up my dorm room and get myself as ready as possible for this thoroughly overwhelming new stage of my life. It was only on the initial day of orientation, when she had to get back on a plane for Sweden, that I for the first time realized I was all alone. I watched her taxi leave the corner of 120th Street and Amsterdam Avenue, and I cried. 

Years later, I looked back at that time, and I frankly marveled at how I made it all work. I was 19 years old, my entire family was on another continent, and I had never studied in the United States before, let alone at an Ivy League college like Columbia, and nothing I had ever experienced before could prepare me for life in New York City in the late 1990s. I never again felt that level of insecurity and uncertainty about the future, as I did at that moment. I often wondered, later in life, if that was an isolated incident or if I could ever take such a massive leap of faith and self-reliance again.

One of the things I recall from that first year was learning all about the institutions I was attending. As I walked through the then massive iron gates of JTS, I looked up at the emblem of the institution and I was confused. Underneath a picture of what was clearly a tree or a shrub of some sort, were three words in Hebrew, והסנה איננו אוכל, “And the bush was not consumed.” It comes from the Book of Exodus, chapter 3, verse 2, referring to the moment when Moses, tending the flock of his father-in-law, Jethro, looked up into the mountains and saw a bush on fire, and yet… it was not being engulfed in the flame or turned to ash. 

Now why on earth would an academic institution make that their tagline???

It just seemed to me like an odd moment to capture. Not God actually speaking to Moses from the bush, not Moses removing his sandals on holy ground, and not God demonstrating miracles to Moses which he could later use to convince the Israelites and Pharaoh that he was indeed an emissary of God on a holy mission. Just, “the bush kept burning…” Riveting stuff. However, over the years I’ve found myself returning to this phrase numerous times, and each time I have developed a new and evolving understanding of it. But rather than give you my perspective right now, I’d like to first share with you a quote from Rabbi Toba Spitzer’s book, “God is Here,” the one I’ve been quoting and referencing throughout these High Holiday sermons. The book is all about trying to develop new relationships with God, and preferably ones that don’t require us to imagine God as a Big Person. She uses lots of textual examples from our Jewish Bible to show that our ancestors likened God to water, a cloud, a rock, and several others. Her book includes a chapter on God seen through the metaphor of fire, in which she brings up this very moment from Exodus.

Spitzer talks about teaching this quote to a group of social justice activists, and asking them why God appears to Moses in this particular way. That’s such a great question. Why not thunder and lightning? Why not a massive talking animal? Or a mysterious, angel-like human figure?? Why an inextinguishable shrub? One participant responded: “Because to take this [work] on, you have to have a fire burning within, an anger about injustice, a passion for the work of liberation. But that fire can overwhelm and consume you.” That answer really resonated with me. I think about my own life and my rabbinic work, and the things in life that make me passionate and excited, and I totally agree with this observation. You need something to kindle that light inside you. A FUSE, of sorts. And you need to figure out how to keep it lit and thriving, or the work can become burdensome and loathsome, and you yourself can become jaded and disillusioned. There’s a reason why losing our energy and our excitement is often called “burnout” or “flaming out.” If the fire inside is extinguished, it’s hard to find your enthusiasm once again.

On the other hand, if you let that fire burn uncontrollably, your passion can turn into obsession, vitriol, and even violence, and it can consume you and everyone around you. It can destroy everything you’ve worked for. That’s pretty daunting, isn’t it? How do you find that balance? Or, as Rabbi Spitzer writes in her book, “While almost anything can be dangerous in excess, the distance between warming your hands by a fire and singeing your fingers is a matter of inches.” We have to guard and keep that flame, while also respecting how thin that line really can be.

Fire is such a particularly good metaphor in this instance. Think about how absolutely vital it is to human survival. So much so, that we often talk about humans harnessing the power of fire as the beginning of civilization! Many of our foods, even today, could be terribly harmful to us if not boiled, cooked, or roasted first. Even water is often not safe to drink until boiled. As mammals without fur, fire was of course vital to prehistoric humans for heat. And without night vision, torches were essential for navigating treacherous environments. At the same time, despite how vital fire may be, there’s also no question how dangerous and life-threatening it can become as well. Especially when we don’t respect it.

Our internal self-preservation and survival instinct might kick into gear here, and caution us that if something is THAT dangerous, we should avoid it altogether. Why even risk it? Well, I return then to the rabbinic quote I’ve been using throughout this series as well, from the Ethics of Our Ancestors, Pirkei Avot, where Rabbi Tarfon reminds us that “we are not required to complete the task, but neither are we free to desist from it.” This is a slightly different reframing, but I still feel his words apply. I hear Rabbi Tarfon reminding us that just because something is scary, concerning, and potentially even dangerous, doesn’t mean we should just give up without trying. Moving to New York City on my own at 19 was pretty terrifying, but I wouldn’t change that journey for anything in the world. In life, you cannot simply desist from walking the paths that are hard.

I often find myself thinking about this concept of taking on scary things even when they’re dangerous, when it comes to parenting. We so desperately want to protect our children from harm, difficulty, pain, and disappointment… and yet, those experiences ARE vital for learning how to be resilient. That doesn’t mean we actively put our kids in harm’s way, but again, it’s hard to find the perfect balance between on the one hand trying to protect them, warn them, and make decisions that we tell ourselves are “for their own good,” while on the other hand, needing to let them explore and discover the world on their own. Our pediatrician once told me, little black and blue marks on kids’ legs and scuffed knees are the sign of a healthy child learning how to navigate the world as well as their own body.

Fire is also an excellent metaphor for emotions, specifically anger. Even in English, our descriptions of getting angry often revolve around feeling our “blood boiling” or being “fuming mad.” But then, society also cautions us, anger is bad. It’s destructive. It can hurt people. And it would be better to let our anger pass, calm down, and then make level-headed decisions. In my pastoral work, I see so many adults who don’t know what to do with their anger. Some retreat into silence, others may start to shake with anger, while yet others may turn to one substance or another to try and force their blood pressure to drop back down. They’re all struggling with this notion that anger is bad. It can be a destructive, fiery blaze that can injure or kill. We must stop it at all costs.

Just look around in society or in the news; we see constant examples of people having no idea how to handle their so-called negative emotions of anger, frustration, disappointment, fear, shame, and guilt. Maybe they get up on a stage and slap someone on national television for saying something they didn’t like. Or they attack authority figures, doctors, and epidemiologists who don’t give them the answers they want. They start wars to annex territory that doesn’t belong to them, dragging entire nations down with them in the process. Or perhaps they join a riot at the seat of their country’s democracy because they didn’t agree with the results of an election. 

As a parent, I see the need from the very earliest moments of child development for this kind of intervention… especially because we see so many adults - including world leaders - who have no clue what to do when their emotions are boiling over or about to explode like a powder keg. All of us, from children to grownups, need better strategies for handling negative emotions. I firmly believe that part of that begins by not thinking of them as wholly negative.

Throughout the Tanach, there are images of God being angry… with some seriously damaging repercussions. In many of those instances, God is described as an “אש אוכלה - an all-consuming fire.” In Leviticus, God’s anger blazes forth against two of Aaron’s sons, when they offer an unsanctioned sacrifice. In the Book of Numbers, God’s flames return for the followers of Korach, rebelling against Moses. And in the Books of Kings, God torches the 400 priests of Ba’al, who challenge the prophet Elijah to a contest of sacrifices. Fire is scary; God’s fire is terrifying. 

At the same time, the Bible also depicts God’s fire as a force for good, protection, and connection as well. The Bible doesn’t view it as inherently negative, and invites us to be in relationship with its positive attributes as well. It is also the pillar of fire in Exodus that protects the Israelites from the oncoming Egyptian hordes by the Sea of Reeds. In Leviticus, fire was an absolutely essential component of how our ancient ancestors connected with God. They didn’t have prayer books or Torah scrolls; only sacrifices. Rabbi Spitzer writes, “the flames on the altar were both a reminder of God as Fire and a means of connecting to the divine.” I imagine that the Israelites, standing there watching the flames and smoke of their offering ascend into heaven, surely felt that God, who otherwise seemed so distant up above, would hear their prayers. 

It is true that the Bible demonstrates how dangerous fire and anger can be… but it also shows how life-giving and protecting it can be, and we need to emulate that ability to keep both types of fire in balance. In general, we need more positive associations with these complex emotions that we otherwise just dismiss as “negative” and “harmful.” The Bible offers many ways to reframe them, yet so often we still do our best to just try and not feel angry or upset. Yet still I maintain, anger can be healing. It can even be transformative. 

Rabbi Spitzer introduces a fascinating concept in her chapter on Holy Fire, that of our ancient ancestors viewing God through the practice of metallurgy. She refers to something called “Furnace Remelting,” where a corroded copper object would be completely melted down in the glowing fire of a furnace, so that it could be made into an entirely new object. She quotes a scholar from Ben Gurion University, Nissin Amzallag, talking about how the Israelites would have seen the power of God’s fire as being creative, renewing, and positive, saying: “it was conceived [by the Israelites] as a wonder leading to a complete rejuvenation of creation through a massive destruction of shape.” When we are thoroughly broken down, it is also an opportunity to rebuild something completely new… and potentially amazing. Just like the myth of the phoenix, a bird that explodes into flames, yet is then born again from the ashes. 

I want us to stay with this vision of the transformational power of fire for a bit. Let’s think again about our own emotions, the ones we sometimes have so much trouble controlling when they start to boil over. It is true, if we find ways to fully express those emotions, and not always try and tamp them down, or hope they’ll just pass, or medicate them away, it may indeed create a massive blaze - that is a risk - but potentially one that is not only healing, but can be completely revolutionizing. Like furnace remelting, it could lead to something entirely new and fresh and liberating… but first we’ve got to walk through that fire. 

In many ways, I look back on my experience of moving to New York for college as a ‘remelting’ experience. It was tough, it was challenging, and it definitely wasn’t easy. But going through a major life change like that and coming out stronger on the other side really set me on a new path for the rest of my life.

It isn’t just my experience either. When I have talked to people who have walked their own challenging, sometimes painful, paths - surviving substance abuse, illnesses, or accidents - they will certainly readily admit that it was an excruciating process. A genuine trial by fire. And yet, without using this exact language, they all say that it was a ‘remelting’ experience too. They went into that blaze - for as long as it was necessary - and they came out as a reformed, stronger, glowing version of themselves. 

When I think of this metaphor for God, it isn’t so much that I picture God as a divine blaze, like some exciting x-men hero in a flame-retardant suit. Rather, I envision this external force that can come in and reshape us, and also, at the same time, a powerful energy that can come from inside us, that can lead us to achieve extraordinary things. Both from outside and from within ourselves; that is where we may find God… or perhaps just godliness. 

One of the fire images that makes its way into the modern synagogue is the Ner Tamid, the Eternal Light. Every synagogue has one, and for some reason it seems to be common knowledge among all Hebrew School students and congregants that the Eternal Light is NEVER supposed to be turned off. That, and never drop a Torah scroll; those seem to be the essential, synagogue 101 facts that everyone knows. The Ner Tamid is meant to remind us of the fire on the altar in the Ancient Temple in Jerusalem, which also was expected to remain lit constantly. Priests would keep watch all night long, to make sure it stayed, you know, eternal. It may also have served as a reminder of that moment of God approaching Moses, in a fiery bush that nevertheless was not consumed, which changed the course of Jewish history forever. 

At the same time, it was also a symbol of the perpetual Divine presence. Just as the fire would always be there, so would God’s Presence. But in her book, Rabbi Spitzer adds another crucial dimension as well. She writes, “the fire perpetually burning on the altar is a reminder that the metaphorical flame in the human heart never actually goes out. We just need to find it, and tend it, in order for that inner blaze to burn true.” Which leads me very nicely back to my High Holiday theme for this year, which is the need to aspire in our lives. 

So often we just go through the day to day, running on autopilot and not living with intentionality. But it’s there, isn’t it? Somewhere deep inside, there is an ember of a flame that’s just waiting to be nurtured, cultivated, and brought back up to a blaze? We just have to strive, again and again, to find it and tend to it. For some people, it might be a desire to participate in Tikkun Olam, either working for a social justice cause or addressing the global environmental crisis. Or perhaps running for political office. For others, it may be a personal passion that just got set aside long ago; maybe playing an instrument, doing something that gets your heart pumping, or perhaps even taking your life in a new direction. Can it be scary? Of course. But when can we justifiably say that something is *too* scary, and when have we just never challenged ourselves to take the leap and confront our fears head on??

Again, I return to that tagline under the JTS symbol; והסנה איננו אוכל - the bush kept burning and burning, but it did not go out. Even when we feel overwhelmed and intimidated, somewhere deep down, we may feel that the Eternal Light inside us continues to smolder. It will not go out. Yom Kippur is the perfect time to go search inside yourselves for just such a flame. On this day, we set aside our material needs and the sustenance of our bodies, and instead focus on finding nourishment for our souls. Is it an easy search? No, of course not. But it’s worth the struggle, and it’s worth spending your time striving to find it. How can you nourish your soul? What do you need at this time that you aren’t getting, and can you search inside for an eternal light that is waiting for you to care for it and really reignite it?

When I left my home in Stockholm in 1999, I was leaving behind community, stability, comfort, and the life I had always known. I didn’t quite set it all on fire, but it did feel a bit like burning bridges behind me. I certainly felt like I was stepping off a cliff, taking a leap of faith and hoping things would work out. I always wondered if I’d need to do that again, and what would happen if I found myself staring off into the wilderness of the unknown; like Moses, wandering along with his sheep, when he looked up and saw that indestructible bush. 

And now, another moment for me is almost here. Another leap of faith, another scary moment of wondering if I do burn up, will I get to start over, like the phoenix rising from the ashes? I guess that remains to be seen. But I still return, again and again, to the importance of facing your fears. Just because something is scary, it doesn’t mean you need to run the other way. Especially because life will put obstacles and challenges in your path over and over again. So many people in this room have dealt with grief, and/or pain, and/or illness, and many other unfortunate circumstances that you wished you never had to deal with. But two things remain true: You cannot change the past. Wish all you like, you cannot magically undo things once they’ve occurred. And second, if you can stay with that experience, be present to it, and really feel the emotions of that painful time, it can become a source of strength and growth. It can become a “furnace remelting” moment, and give you new tools for dealing with whatever *else* life has in store for you.

So as I finish this sermon, and thus my final High Holiday sermon series, I pray for all of us to learn and grow from the pain of this moment. Yes, it can feel like burning, searing anguish, but it is only the end of one stage in all our lives and in the life of this community, and can lead to the rebirth of another phoenix experience on the other end. Rather than a consuming fire, it can instead be a Ner Tamid, a perpetual flame that just needs new kindling and firewood, but ultimately it is the same fire that keeps going. 

Standing here, I find my attention back at that image of the Burning Bush. That moment of realizing it wasn’t being consumed was Moses’ first realization of God’s Presence and his own destiny taking him in an entirely new direction. It was a terrifying moment, to be sure, but I also imagine that Moses realized the bush continuing to burn and not being destroyed meant it wasn’t something to fear. It was a symbol of God’s care and concern, a burning desire to stay in relationship with Moses and the Jewish People. I hope that even as I end my tenure here as the Rabbi of Ohev Shalom, that our relationship will continue to burn, and our connection will not end. 

At this point, I set aside my sermon and spoke without prepared remarks. In essence, I thanked the congregation for these magical 13 1/2 years, and told them - and that includes you, dear readers, as well - what a fabulous community this is. It will be very, very hard to say goodbye. Thank you for everything. Shanah Tovah!


Friday, August 5, 2022

Devarim (Shabbat Chazon): Doom and Gloom… and Celebration Too

This Shabbat, we are starting the fifth Book of Moses, called “Devarim” or “Deuteronomy.” In addition, it is the Shabbat before Tisha b’Av, which is a day of mourning and commemoration on the Jewish calendar. And the Shabbat immediately preceding Tisha b’Av is always called “Shabbat Chazon,” meaning the “Shabbat of Vision.” The vision that we’re talking about, however, is unfortunately not an uplifting or joyous one, but rather the first prophecy expressed by Isaiah, filled with words of rebuke and predictions of doom. It isn’t easy to sit with these emotions of grief and sadness, but I think it’s really quite necessary. Tisha b’Av primarily recalls the destructions of both Temples in Jerusalem (in 587 BCE and 70 CE), along with many other calamities that have befallen our ancestors over the course of millennia. Is it fun to talk about death and destruction, or to have to listen to Isaiah’s words of anger and frustration? No, but think about what it can yield for us all on the other end.

It’s important to think of Tisha b’Av in the context of what we might call “normal” grief, i.e. when a loved one dies and we’re mourning a personal loss. If we don’t acknowledge our sadness and allow ourselves to cry, we can’t process what has happened, and it is very difficult to move on and begin to heal. For both our national grief and our personal grief, the goal is not to “get over” our mourning and forget about our loss, but rather to incorporate it into our lives in a healthier way. Tisha b’Av clearly isn’t joyful and celebratory, but perhaps by allowing ourselves to be fully present to what our ancestors endured, we can appreciate our festivities more completely. After all, if those calamities had been worse, we wouldn’t still be here to talk about them, so the very fact of our being able to remember and retell our history is a major cause for celebration!

I would also add that not every occasion needs to be about merriment and feasting. Tisha b’Av is always one of the most spiritual and impactful services for me personally, despite its unpleasant theme. We sit in a dimly lit sanctuary late in the evening (on Saturday night at 8pm), we chant the beautiful Book of Lamentations, and we reflect and introspect. I certainly enjoy many of our other holidays as well, but there is something ancient and powerful about Tisha b’Av that just doesn’t come out for me in many other days on our calendar. I know Saturday night isn’t the most convenient time, and maybe I haven’t sold it very well for you, but I nevertheless encourage you to come and experience it for yourselves. It’s really unlike any other observance we have.

Whether you’re able to attend or not, I also invite you to think about the importance of embracing the wide spectrum of our emotions. Some feel easier to sit with and enjoy, while others can feel painful or uncomfortable. I get it. But that’s also what it means to be a human being, isn’t it? I certainly know it’s a vital part of what it means to be a Jew. In fact, I would argue that our healthy, repeated, persistent engagement with ALL aspects of our history is one of the great powers of the Jewish People, and a major reason why you and I are still here, able to talk about it all! On Shabbat Chazon, we may be chanting a literal doom-and-gloom prophetic vision. And even though Isaiah’s prophecies did come true for the people living at that time, it is also true that we are still here. The Jewish People are still here and able to observe all the sacred occasions on our calendar, and experience all the emotions that come with them. So yes, we will be chanting a pretty sad text. But our very ability to chant that text is itself a cause for celebration. 



Friday, July 8, 2022

Chukat: I See Your Calf and Raise You a Snake

Even if you're not that familiar with the Torah or all the stories contained within it, you probably know a few central ideas. You might have heard of Adam & Eve, Noah, Abraham, slavery in Egypt, the Ten Commandments, and a handful of other key points. One such concept that I think is pretty well-known is that you're not supposed to make graven images. No idols, no statues for worshipping, no house gods of any shape or size, and just no bowing down to, or praying to, anyone or anything but God. And the most infamous example of what not to do has got to be the Golden Calf, which the Israelites built in the desert and venerated as if it were a god. And clearly, based on that story, we all learned that no such images or statues can be used in ANY way. Right?? Well... yes and no. This week, our Torah reading offers us a surprising and bewildering example of a permitted statue, and - just like so many other stories in the Bible - it leaves us with more questions than answers. As it should be.

It starts the same way too many other stories from this time period already have, namely with the people rebelling against Moses, Aaron, and especially God. The people bark at their leaders: "Why did you make us leave Egypt to die in this wilderness?!? There is no bread and no water, and we have come to loathe this miserable food [the manna]!" (Numbers 21:5) By this point, God is getting pretty darn fed up with these ingrates, and God sends against the people a plague of poisonous, deadly snakes! When the people inevitably repent and cry out for help, God instructs Moses to do something most surprising: "Make a seraph [winged snake] figure and mount it on a standard. And if anyone who is bitten looks at it, he shall recover." (v. 8) So I guess part of the message we're meant to take from this is, calves are bad and snakes are good? Now, we should acknowledge that God directing Moses to do something is quite a bit different than the people just erecting a statue on their own. Nor does anyone ever call out to the flying-snake-thingy: "This is your god, O Israel, who brought you out of the land of Egypt" as they did for the Golden Calf in Exodus, 32:4. Nevertheless, I think the use of an animal statue is understandably confusing... 

I also feel it necessary to point out that our fears regarding the serpent-statue are not unfounded. Centuries after the Exodus, we find an intriguing reference back to this mystical healing device in the Second Book of Kings, during the religious reformations under King Hezekiah: "He [Hezekiah] abolished the shrines and smashed the pillars and cut down the sacred post. He also broke into pieces the bronze serpent that Moses had made, for until that time the Israelites had been offering sacrifices to it; it was called Nechushtan." (II Kings, 18:4) Despite God's best intentions, some people simply couldn't resist the urge to offer sacrifices TO the snake-statue as a graven image. The commentaries speculate wildly about what's going on here. One perspective suggests God used a snake to remind the Israelites of the conniving serpent that misled Adam & Eve back in the Garden of Eden. That snake was punished for his incendiary words; and the Israelites were similarly punished for their own inflammatory attacks on God and Moses. Another commentary posits that the serpent is a poignant symbol of how dangerous the desert can be, and might help remind the Israelites that the only reason they've been surviving for 40 years is because of God's favor.

To me, an important lesson that comes from this story is intentionality. The same act can be either a destructive transgression or a source of healing. Similarly, when we express a sentiment to another person, our decision to infuse our comment with kindness versus passive-aggression versus outright hostility can change everything about how it's received. Even the energy with which we express ourselves can vastly alter our words, regardless of whether we do so intentionally or not. Perhaps the text is suggesting that have to be mindful of ourselves and how we are perceived by others all the time. We cannot hide behind saying a certain act or a particular phrase "always" means one thing and not another, it's much more complex than that. Our body language, our energy, our facial expressions, our intentions, and our tone of voice; all of them contribute to how we are perceived and how our sentiments are understood. At times, the text can seem inconsistent, as if it's prioritizing one act over a seemingly identical one elsewhere, possibly for arbitrary reasons. But those moments invite us to look closer, read more sensitively, and pay more attention to nuance, contrast, and intention. When we do that, we can learn so much more from the text, and even learn more about our own behaviors as well.


CC images in this blog post, courtesy of:
1. Wellcome Images on Wikimedia Commons
2. 7ustalvin on Wikimedia Commons
3. Jubjang on Rawpixel
4. Sheila Brown on PublicDomainPictures


Thursday, June 23, 2022

Sh’lach Lecha: Who Puts the "Ger" in Stranger?

One wonderful and infinitely complex aspect of the Torah text - in general - revolves around the issue of interpretation. It’s so hard to say “the Torah says…” because every time you translate something, you have to choose between synonyms to decide the nuance, tone, and intention of what you think the original text says. This week, we find a critical example of this ambiguity in one pivotal word that affected our ancient ancestors and still (maybe more so) affects us today. It caught my eye, because the Torah restates this commandment in back-to-back verses. Ok, so let’s “ger” right into it, shall we? 

In Numbers, chapter 15, verses 15-16, we read: 

“15: There shall be one law for you and for the resident stranger; it shall be a law for all time throughout the ages. You and the stranger shall be alike before Adonai. 16: the same ritual and the same rule shall apply to you and to the stranger who resides among you.”

Perhaps surprisingly, the ambiguous word in those verses - and indeed throughout the Torah - is “stranger.” The word in Hebrew is “Ger,” and a big question that we need to clarify is, who is the stranger? Is it just someone who is unfamiliar to you personally? Or someone who resides with you temporarily, but not permanently? Is this someone who was not born Jewish but who converted? Or a non-Jewish individual who has no intention of converting, but who nevertheless lives with you? What complicates the matter is that it’s used in all of the above ways throughout the Torah. In Genesis, Abraham refers to himself as a Ger, meaning he’s an outsider with no claims to land and no status among the Hittites where he lives (but he certainly hasn't converted to their religion, nor does he have any plans to). In Exodus, the Jewish People are repeatedly reminded by God that we were “strangers (Gerim) in the land of Egypt.” But again, the Israelites weren't converts TO Egyptian culture, but merely status-less outsiders. Yet when the text later talks about Gerim living among us - like in our parashah - most commentators translate this as “convert” or “proselyte.” And the implications are significant.

Why does this matter? Well, when the Torah commands us to take care of the poor, the orphan, the widow... and "the stranger" in our midst, is it talking only about converts (and thus perhaps only concerned with taking care of fellow Jews), or about all people, including non-Jews? Most classic rabbinic commentaries defer to the convert-translation. One of the most famous of these was Rambam (or Maimonides) who wrote a thousand years ago: "All [occurrences of the term] 'Ger' which are said regarding gifts to the poor are nothing other than a 'Ger Tzedek' (i.e. a convert)." Personally, I am dismayed by this assertion, because I read our texts as absolutely commanding us to be kind and considerate to *all* people, regardless of religion, race, ethnicity, or any other defining characteristic. How unfortunate that, when our texts already have multiple instances of commandments directing us to take care of fellow Jews, and here we have an opportunity to expand the circle and extend God's Love more broadly, so many authorities choose instead to read it as yet another example of taking care of our own.

Even if we were to agree to read Ger as convert, I'm still bothered by it. We so often state that once someone has converted they are Jewish, plain and simple. No second-guessing, no questioning, no exclusions. So why would this text be talking about fellow Jews as "strangers" and "outsiders," just because at one point they converted into the religion?? Today, in our diverse and multicultural world, I firmly believe we need to emphasize inclusion. We can absolutely still acknowledge the differences between being Jewish and not, and I don't mind saying there are certain mitzvot and rituals that are exclusively performed by Jews during a Jewish prayer service. But we cannot, and should not, wall ourselves off from our neighbors all around us, no matter how different from us they may be. Clearly, not all authorities read it this way, but there is no doubt in my mind as to what the Torah (and God) meant here. And the commandment to treat all people the same was not only true in the time of the Torah, but is just as much true today in our modern world. If not more so.



Friday, January 28, 2022

Mishpatim: Who the Chell is Chur??

I fell down a rabbit hole again. Not literally, of course, but I found an interesting mention in the text of our parashah, and (to mix my metaphors here...) I pulled on a tiny thread and an entire sweater unraveled! And I must tell you, it's probably one of my favorite things to do as an exegete. (Side note: I'm not sure when one can 'officially' start calling her/himself an expounder of the Biblical text (i.e. an exegete), but as I approach my 650th blog post on the Torah text, I think I qualify. :-)) I love to find a word, phrase, expression, or strange reference in the Bible, and just see what happens if I look it up in all its various forms and locations. This week, we're hot on the trail of an obscure character in the Torah; a man named Chur (or Hur). 

Weeks ago, his name came up in a most surprising place. As the Israelites set off on their journey into the desert, their trials and tribulations began almost instantly. One of their first battles was against the Amalekites (in Exodus, chapter 17), during which four people are mentioned by name. Joshua is the general who leads the troops into battle. Moses ascends a mountain, and whenever his arms are raised, the Israelites start winning... but when his arms fall back down, the Amalekites start to prevail. In order to help the Children of Israel keep winning, his one arm is held up by his brother, Aaron, and the other one is held up by... Chur (v. 12). Who's *this* dude?? It's like one of those children's puzzles - "one of these things is not like the others..." Three incredibly famous characters, both here and throughout the Bible... and then Chur. After this supportive role (literally), he mainly disappears into obscurity again.

And that's really the last we "Hur-d" (heard) of him until this week's Torah portion. Again, with no introduction or explanation, he shows up in a leadership role once again. As Moses and Joshua ascend Mount Sinai to receive God's Laws, Moses says to the 70 elders accompanying them, “Wait here for us until we return to you. And here are Aaron and Chur with you; let anyone who has a legal concern approach them.” (Ex. 24:14) Chur? A top leader on the same level as Aaron, and above Moses’ entourage of 70?? Who is this guy anyway?? Well, the medieval commentator, Rashi, wonders the same thing, and posits a most fascinating solution. Rashi finds a remote reference in the First Book of Chronicles (2:19), that mentions in passing that Chur is the son of Caleb (one of only two people - along with Joshua - to see both the start and end of the 40-year Exodus). Rashi also adds that Chur’s mother was… wait for it… Moses’ and Aaron’s sister, Miriam! Ooooh, so it's really just the ol’ boss’s nephew syndrome. Maybe *that's* how he rose the ranks...

Joking aside, this would definitely explain why he travels in such privileged circles. He’s part of the family! I love when the rabbis find obscure, remote links like this, and use them to tie narratives together. I actually found two additional, intriguing (but minor) references, but I'm running out of space in this blog post. Instead, I'll be mentioning them in services this weekend, though feel free to write a comment here or e-mail me if you'd like to learn more. My point in sharing all of this with you is to demonstrate both the depth of the Biblical text - with all these peripheral characters and seemingly far-flung connections - and also to show you the brilliance of the rabbinic exegetical process. They sometimes scour Scripture and midrashic texts to find possible links and solutions, and the result is a rich tapestry of interwoven stories that link together across stories, distance, and millennia. It starts with something that appears insignificant, e.g. the name of a character mentioned in passing. But you start to pull on that thread, or dig deeper into that hole, and suddenly the rabbit's entire sweater has come undone! Ok, I mixed my metaphors again, but hopefully you get the picture. Or should I say "pict-Hur"?


CC images in this blog post, courtesy of:
1. Valerie Hinojosa on Flickr
2. Dave Morris on Flickr
3. Steve Jurvetson on Flickr
4. staceyjoy on Flickr


Friday, August 27, 2021

Ki Tavo: This Too Shall Pass… And This Too.

In the Biblical book of Ecclesiastes, we find the following insightful verse: “Be pleased when things go well; but in a time of misfortune, reflect.” (7:14) One of the central lessons of the entire Tanach, the complete Jewish Bible, is the value of mindfulness. Be present to your current experience - right here, right now, TODAY! - regardless of what’s happening. If it’s a time of celebration, peace, relaxation, and joy; fabulous! Good for you, enjoy it, and may more of these be in your future. Above all, be grateful and appreciative. And if it’s a time of uncertainty, pain, frustration, apathy, or grief, you should *still* be present to it. Don’t hide from such moments or try to numb them with distractions, willful ignorance, or - at the more extreme end - substance abuse. Instead, ask yourself what you can learn from this experience, and how it can make you stronger and a better person. Our Torah portion this week not only echoes this sentiment, but offers a formula to recite at precisely such moments.

We are approaching the end of the Five Books of Moses, and thus the moment when the Israelites will enter the Promised Land. Even though Moses himself won’t get to join them, he still has his gaze firmly set on what will happen to them when they cross over. And, as articulated above, he implores them to remain mindful and present to their experiences, be they good or bad. Moses prophetically looks ahead to a time beyond just their entrance, to when the people will eventually be settled, at peace, and comfortably in possession of this land of milk and honey. He instructs them: “When you enter the land that Adonai, your God, is giving you as a heritage, and you possess it and settle in it, you shall take some of every first fruit of the soil, which you harvest from the land Adonai, your God, is giving you, put it in a basket and go to the place where Adonai, your God, will choose to establish God’s Name… you shall then recite as follows before Adonai, your God…” (Deut. 26:1-2, 5) The formula/prayer/declaration that follows is one that later gets included - verbatim - in the Passover Haggadah. It begins, “My father was a wandering Aramean. He went down to Egypt with meager numbers and stayed there, and became a great and populous nation.” (6)

Several rabbinic commentators focus on the beginning of this phrase, and the sentiment that our ancestor, Jacob, was once alone in the desert, impoverished and afraid. Even when the family moved to Egypt to escape famine, it was a small clan; a single family of outsiders in this mighty, foreign empire. The purpose of starting the declaration this way is so that the Israelite reciting it, now with land of his/her own, surrounded by allies and countrymen, may say: “And now look at us! Look how far we’ve come!!” Remembering how our ancestors had nothing is meant to evoke humility, appreciation, and most importantly gratitude to God. One medieval rabbinic commentator, Rabbeinu Bachya, writes on this verse: “The moral lesson implied in this whole recitation is that precisely at a time when one is prosperous and free from worry one has to look back upon what preceded this success and acknowledge Who it is that enabled one to achieve this well-being.” The “Who,” of course, is God.

Even then, part of the point that these rabbis are making (and that this rabbi writing right now is echoing..) is to be mindful regardless of what is happening in the present moment. We sometimes mainly think to offer prayers when we’re upset, concerned, or in need of something… but isn’t it also crucial to say a prayer in good times as well? One of my favorite phrases that expresses this perfectly is “This too shall pass.” When times are bad - whether because we’re wandering in the desert, enslaved somewhere, or enduring a pandemic - we can feel comforted in knowing This Too Shall Pass. But in times of joy, remember also that This TOO Shall Pass, and just savor it as long as you can. Change is inevitable, and time marches on regardless. So don’t waste a single second of it. Every moment is a chance to learn something, to grow, and to improve. We may no longer be wandering Arameans, or even Israelites offering the first fruits of our harvest at the Temple, but the message remains the same: Be mindful and grateful, and then our lives will be filled with meaning and purpose. Shabbat Shalom!


CC images in this blog post, courtesy of:
1. Sheila Craan on Flickr
2. Nandhinikandhasamy on Wikimedia Commons
3. pxfuel
4. caramoulds on Flickr

Thursday, July 29, 2021

Eikev: Thanks for the Grub - Yay, God!

Judaism considers it important to bless our food. We have short phrases to recite *before* we eat something (with specific wording for basically ANY food or drink you can imagine!), and then longer prayers that are recited or sung *after* we eat as well. So let's take a moment and ask ourselves, “why?” Well, the Biblical explanation comes from a single verse in this week’s Torah portion… but that only tells us part of the story. It can get us thinking about the importance of blessing our foods, but then we need to dig deeper still. Our ancestors believed a fundamental truth about how food relates to the Divine, to the earth, and to our bodies, so let’s examine their perspective and see whether it remains relevant for us today as well. 

You may be familiar with the traditional Jewish Grace after Meals, a.k.a. Birkat Ha-Mazon, a.k.a. “the benching” (Yiddish for "blessing") There are shorter versions and longer ones, with special additional paragraphs for Shabbat and holidays. Interestingly, in even the longest version, there’s only ever ONE verse that comes directly from the Torah. The benching does include psalms and other Biblical quotes, but in terms of material specifically from The Five Books of Moses, it’s just this one verse from our parashah: “When you have eaten, and are satiated, you shall bless Adonai, your God, for the good land which God has given you.” (Deut. 8:10) So back to our original question, why? Why do we bless God? Because the Jewish theology around food is quite clear - you don’t own anything that you eat. It all belongs to God, and you/me/everyone needs to express gratitude for our ability to eat and be satisfied. 

Maybe that concept seems obvious to you… or maybe you fundamentally disagree (and feel free to comment below and share your thoughts), but it has always resonated with me. Whether we grow our own food, support a farm collective, or buy everything from a store or online grocer; the food still isn’t ours. We really need to acknowledge that in our community today, many of us do not struggle with food insecurity, the way millions of people do across the globe every single day. We had no control over where we were born or in what era. Our financial means and our abundant access to food - all these things are miraculous gifts from God! Yet sometimes we let ourselves think that we made this happen. 

All around us, we hear sentiments in society that essentially amount to some version of: “Why should I share my resources with others who don’t deserve it?” The Torah’s resounding answer is, it’s not your decision. God gave you this bounty, not you yourself, and you are expected - required even - to thank God for all these blessings. There are so many dangerous pitfalls where we may be tempted to think we made our own successes happen. We contributed, sure, but God’s partnership was, and always will be, vital for anything to work. When we acknowledge that, we hopefully learn to be humble, and then ideally show compassion towards (all!) others who have less than we do. So many of us are truly blessed to not worry where our next meal will come from. That verse I quoted from Deuteronomy reminds us that when it’s effortless for us to eat, and obvious that we’ll get to feel satiety, we must then also bless God. Now, who’s hungry?


CC images in this blog post, courtesy of:
1. jimbomack66 on Wikimedia Commons
2. AllaSerebrina on Deposit Photos
3. pxhere.com
4. The US National Archives


Friday, February 26, 2021

Tetzaveh: And You Thought It was Only Used for Cooking...

Often, when I sit down to write this blog, I stumble on a word, phrase, sentence, or theme in the week’s reading that catches my attention. I research it a little, massage the idea in my head before sharing it with you, and then sometimes add a little “spice” or “fragrance” at the end. I think you’ll see what I mean. :-) This week, we’re learning about the garments, behaviors, and practices of Aaron, the High Priest, and the other Kohanim (priests) in the ancient Tabernacle in the desert. They had a lot of rules. A lot of regulations, expectations, strictures, parameters, and guidelines. It definitely wasn’t an easy job, and being the intermediaries to connect with the Divine for the ENTIRE people certainly didn’t make the stakes any lower either! And it was the initiation ritual - to really *grease* the wheels and gears of the whole operation, and get it up and running - that peaked my interest this time.

In Exodus 29:7, having read that Aaron and his sons were clothed in all the ritual garb prescribed, and that they’re FINALLY ready to get to work, Moses actually *anoints* them to complete their transformation into holy priests: “Take the anointing oil, and pour it on his [Aaron’s] head.” (Also mentioned in Ex. 28:41) Interestingly, the word for “anoint” in Hebrew is “limshoch,” and this root gives us the word “Mashiach,” or “Messiah,” meaning “anointed one.” Of course, when many of us think of the word “Messiah,” we may jump to a very Christian, Christ-filled context, or drift off into the world of eschatology, meaning End of Days theology, and the questions of an ultimate Redeemer or Savior coming to rescue us all on Judgment Day. In other words, it’s a pretty loaded term. Which is also why I often like to point out that the word itself just means “rubbed [with oil].” It was originally a technical term for installing the ancient High Priest (from our parashah), then became a ceremony for proclaiming a new king (from the First Book of Samuel), and eventually morphed into this notion of an Ultimate King, a Sovereign - chosen by God - to save us at the End Of It All.

Then I got to thinking: why oil? Why this particular ritual, and not some other way of initiating someone into a high position of authority? Like a knighting ceremony, or a swearing in with a Holy Text, or perhaps just a hazing ritual; why oil, and why poured over the head and rubbed into the skin? I was fascinated to read (under the topic of “Holy Anointing Oil”) that our ancient ancestors associated foul odors with disease, decay, rotting processes, and death. Even then, they didn’t mean it was awful or evil, just a reminder of mortality, of how transient life is, and that all (mundane) things die. Conversely, pleasing aromas were both associated with cleanliness and vitality, but also food production, harvesting, abundance, and immortality. Fragrances in ritual worship became a necessity, because they would elevate the experiences of the people, and remind them of holiness and divinity, and were also seen as “pleasing” to God. Throughout the Torah, and even in later books like Psalms, the text refers to Adonai enjoying the “rayach nichoach,” “pleasing aroma” of the sacrificial offerings. 

I have also recently been learning more about meditative practices, yoga, energy, and other ways to connect to our inner selves and to spiritual aspects of the world beyond ourselves. One of the practices in this discipline revolves around - you guessed it - essential oils. Not just the oil itself, but specifically FRAGRANT oil, just like we read about in the Bible. In this world of spiritual healing, essential oils “bypass the brain” and connect to a higher, yet deeper side of ourselves. I'm not saying you have to rush out and smear yourselves in essential oils, but just sit with the concept for a second. How often do we think of spirituality through the olfactory sense? Not too often, I venture to say. And the physical aspect of actually *rubbing* oil into the skin definitely has calming and relaxing benefits. How crazy is this really? Just ponder it, without judgment. Notice how we can engage our senses in so many different ways. We sometimes call this New Age-y stuff, but how fascinating to see it date back to the Torah! It is always good to challenge ourselves to see something in a new way. I hope that my pointing out the connection between Aaron's ritual, then anointing a king, to Messianic hopes, to spiritual self-healing has opened your mind a little. And maybe your nostrils too! :-)


CC images in this blog post, all from Pixabay, courtesy of:
1. Pavlofox
2. stevepb
3. marcosantiago
4. mohamed_hasan

Friday, October 23, 2020

Noach: Don’t Be A Nimrod

Sometimes, reading the text of the Torah is like faking your way into a club you’re not supposed to be in. Someone thought we belonged, so we made it inside... but now we don’t know any of the lingo to be a “real” insider. And yet, it’s still amazingly cool to be here! I love when the Torah feels like this. I’m so intrigued... and so confused. Let me give you an example: Every once in a while, the Torah says something like, “Hence the expression... “blah, blah, blah.” With that brief introduction, the Torah has already revealed so much! Someone, at some point in the distant past, presented this information to an audience, and felt comfortable assuming the audience ubiquitously knew this “common” expression, and thought that the new information they were providing was merely its origin. As interlopers at this party, we just nod along and say, “oh yeah, sure! Ha! Of course! THAT expression? Yup, I totally know what you mean...” When really, we have no idea what they’re talking about.

Perhaps one of the most intriguing instances of this is presented in our Torah portion. Having concluded the story of Noah and the Flood, the Torah provides a lineage of ten generations from Noah down to Abraham. In the middle of this list, we read: “Cush also begot Nimrod, who was the first man of might on earth. He was a mighty hunter before Adonai; hence the saying, “Like Nimrod, a mighty hunter before Adonai.” (Gen. 10:8-9) (Ok, ok! Don’t blow our cover!! Just nod along, smile, and pretend you’ve DEFINITELY heard that expression before...) According to the rabbinic commentator Ibn Ezra, this was a common expression in the time of Moses... which would be around a millennium after Nimrod died! But there’s also SO MUCH more going on here, right? How amazing that we’re learning about the first superhero in the Ancient World?!? “The first man of might on earth”?? How amazing. Fun aside: Some scholars actually attribute the reversal in meaning from “mighty hunter” to “idiot, dummy, fool” to (don’t laugh) the cartoon Bugs Bunny, who first leveled “Nimrod” as an insult against Elmer Fudd... possibly meaning that Fudd, the hunter, was no Nimrod!!

We have to stop for a bit, though, and also talk about this expression, “a mighty hunter BEFORE ADONAI.” In Hebrew, the term is “Lifnei Adonai,” and if you look it up on a site like biblehub.com, you’ll find that some translations render it as “by the grace of God,” or “in the sight of the Lord,” or even “AGAINST God”! Well, those versions offer some VERY different meanings! Rabbinic commentators compare it to the Book of Jonah, where the mighty Assyrian (enemy) capital, Nineve, is described as “a great city for the Lord.” Then, the rabbis offer an interesting interpretation. God does indeed increase the strength of these people and places, but only for a period of time, SO THAT eventually God’s Greatness can be experienced through their destruction. Or, to put it another way, God was fully aware of Nimrod’s might, and even endorsed and supported it, so that when Nimrod eventually was brought low, God - and by extension, God’s people - would be glorified. It is, perhaps, a bit of a long walk, but I also understand where they’re coming from.

I genuinely adore hanging out in this fascinating nightclub that is the Torah! Half the time, I have no idea what’s going on, but it’s clearly amazing, mysterious, and intriguing. But I will also tell you, I don’t believe it was an accident that we were admitted. When we are puzzled by the Biblical stories, it may prod us to ask questions, to research sources, and try and make sense of what we’re seeing. That, my friends, is the beginning of relationship! That’s how the Torah draws us in. And while Nimrod originally meant an amazing warrior, it is also no coincidence that the expression has reversed. We strive to be a peace-loving people who venerate Adonai; not idolators who worship military expertise, violence, and war. This brief, little reference is also a reminder to us to rethink and reexamine our priorities. What REALLY makes someone great? What is at the heart of good leadership? And I think we could all agree, it is NOT being a Nimrod... no matter how you define it.


CC images in this blog post, courtesy of:

Friday, September 25, 2020

Rosh Hashanah 5781 (2020) - Torah Reading Intro, Day 2

Shanah Tovah!

So… there’s this woman... In the Bible. (I really narrowed it down for you, didn’t I?) She can’t have any children. (Hm… that’s true for A LOT of Biblical women; maybe that didn’t help you much.) Her husband has children by a second woman (sadly, that doesn’t trim the lineup much either). She’s very upset about her predicament and she calls out to God for help. (STILL a bunch of candidates?? Ok, maybe I should just tell you who I’m talking about…)

Oddly enough, all of what I just said really DOES apply to several Biblical heroines; Sarah, Rebecca, Rachel, Chanah, Samson’s unnamed mother, the Shunamite woman who appeals to the prophet Elisha. It’s intriguing, I think, that such a theme would be repeated over and over again. Though, if we think about it, we could likely each imagine many reasons why. I venture to say that at least one is about the importance of passing on our traditions and customs to a next generation. All of this - everything we do in life - kind of just ends, if there isn’t a next generation of our family, our congregants, citizens in our country, or humans on this earth. We don’t have to limit our scope to just parenting; there is so much that we pass on from one person to another, and from one era to another.  

So the theme of “Oh no! What will our heroes do? It is the end of the line for them and their family!!!” is significant. And of course, the answer to all their prayers is - God swooping down, performing the miraculous, and she has a child. It’s a patriarchal story cover-to-cover, so let’s also acknowledge that yeah, the answer to everyone’s prayers is a BOY! But what I really wanted to share with you this morning is an interesting aspect OF that same theme, that both connects to it and offers a pretty stark and blunt reminder about the obligations it creates in us. 

So you’ve got this theme, right? Repeating over and over. Woman, no child, miserable, God steps in, BABY BOY, everyone celebrates. And there are actually two of them that we read close together, both on Rosh Hashanah. The first would have been yesterday’s Haftarah, from the very beginning of the First Book of Samuel, where a woman named Chanah had no children, her husband had a second wife with a TON of kids (it doesn’t matter, let’s say she had 38 children), and Chanah was despondent. God hears her pleas and grants her a son, Samuel, whom she “dedicates” to Temple service, meaning that when he’s old enough, he goes and lives at the Temple in Jerusalem, under the tutelage of the priest, Eli. Great. Fine. Lovely. Boarding School. Very Harry Potter; terrific.

Today, our Torah reading begins similarly. Sarah, married to Abraham, no kids, inconsolable. Abraham has a child with Sarah’s handmaiden, Hagar, which actually makes things WORSE. But God gets involved, angels come to visit, and they have a son, Isaac. All is right with the world. Then, somehow, we lose control of the steering wheel, our proverbial car careens off the road, and the “happily ever after” turns into a nightmare. God says (but not in so many words): “I gave you that son. You owe me. You need to offer him as a sacrifice on an altar back to me.” I shouldn’t say this from the Bimah… but “what the hell?!?” The logic is perverse, right??? You prayed for a son, I answered your prayers, so now as a sign of gratitude, kill the kid. 

Now we can offer all kinds of explanations for why God was never intending to go through with it, or it was just a test, or we simply don’t understand the depths of meaning and intention here, blah, blah, blah. This story makes me, anyway, deeply uncomfortable… and, quite frankly, mad at God. And this week, I read a two-sentence commentary by Rabbi Arthur Waskow, that offered new a new perspective. I thought it was just so terrific, that I wanted to share it with you. 

Waskow writes, so simply: “Seems to me that the rabbis’ choice of the story of Chana as the Haftarah [on the] 1st day Rosh Hashanah was a quiet rebuke of the Akedah [the Binding of Isaac]: to bring your child as an olah [for dedication], you don’t need to kill him or come even close. Do what Chana did, through prayer and steadfast chesed [righteousness], lift him to become a prophet.” I love this. In a sense, Waskow is suggesting incredible rabbinic chutzpah. When God conveys to Abraham, “you owe me,” Abraham is supposed to say “yes, AND…” My version is: You’re right, God. Abraham does owe you. We all do. We all should be incredibly grateful and appreciative of the blessings in our lives, and to know that joy, love, cuddling, closeness, and passing on our traditions from generation to generation - these are ALL phenomenal gifts. Buuuut, I’m not killing a child. That is NOT how I will show you my gratitude. Who talks like that to GOD?!? Oh yeah, we do. 

I also love this, because the rabbis NEVER outright criticize the Torah. God forbid! They just mandate that we read the story of Chanah FIRST, then the Akeidah, the Binding of Isaac, so that we might say to ourselves, “huh. That was an interesting choice. Why couldn’t Abraham just have done what Chanah did? Teach the boy how to love God, be a force for righteousness and goodness in our world, help some of the less-fortunate of God’s creations, and THAT can be the way you dedicate him TO God!!!” But the rabbis never SAY that… they just subtly lay that out there for us to see. Not for nuthin’... bad call, God. Just sayin’...

My commentary on that, and then we’ll jump into our Torah reading is, we all have to find this balance too. Yes, we DO have to educate our children, give them a sense of values, pride in the self and in our religion, and a commitment to justice, compassion, and fairness. But we cannot sacrifice our children on the altars of our own causes. And we do sometimes. People do… and we’re tempted to say “other” people, but it’s worth stopping and thinking about ourselves too. We don’t bind a child to a physical altar and raise a knife over our heads to do something unthinkable (though I’m told when you’re the parent of teenagers, the thought MAY cross your mind…). But there are other ways that we DO damage our kids, and other ways to challenge ourselves to be better partners WITH them, and work together to demonstrate shared gratitude to God for the gift of life, meaning, love, and commitment. 

As we begin our Torah reading, let’s all put Chanah (from yesterday) and Abraham (right here) on two ends of a spectrum, and spend some time figuring out where we, and our own values, could potentially fall somewhere between them. Just sayin’... Our Torah reading begins in the High Holiday Machzor, page 103.



Rosh Hashanah 5781 (2020) - Torah Reading Intro, Day 2

Shanah Tovah!

So… there’s this woman... In the Bible. (I really narrowed it down for you, didn’t I?) She can’t have any children. (Hm… that’s true for A LOT of Biblical women; maybe that didn’t help you much.) Her husband has children by a second woman (sadly, that doesn’t trim the lineup much either). She’s very upset about her predicament and she calls out to God for help. (STILL a bunch of candidates?? Ok, maybe I should just tell you who I’m talking about…)

Oddly enough, all of what I just said really DOES apply to several Biblical heroines; Sarah, Rebecca, Rachel, Chanah, Samson’s unnamed mother, the Shunamite woman who appeals to the prophet Elisha. It’s intriguing, I think, that such a theme would be repeated over and over again. Though, if we think about it, we could likely each imagine many reasons why. I venture to say that at least one is about the importance of passing on our traditions and customs to a next generation. All of this - everything we do in life - kind of just ends, if there isn’t a next generation of our family, our congregants, citizens in our country, or humans on this earth. We don’t have to limit our scope to just parenting; there is so much that we pass on from one person to another, and from one era to another.  

So the theme of “Oh no! What will our heroes do? It is the end of the line for them and their family!!!” is significant. And of course, the answer to all their prayers is - God swooping down, performing the miraculous, and she has a child. It’s a patriarchal story cover-to-cover, so let’s also acknowledge that yeah, the answer to everyone’s prayers is a BOY! But what I really wanted to share with you this morning is an interesting aspect OF that same theme, that both connects to it and offers a pretty stark and blunt reminder about the obligations it creates in us. 

So you’ve got this theme, right? Repeating over and over. Woman, no child, miserable, God steps in, BABY BOY, everyone celebrates. And there are actually two of them that we read close together, both on Rosh Hashanah. The first would have been yesterday’s Haftarah, from the very beginning of the First Book of Samuel, where a woman named Chanah had no children, her husband had a second wife with a TON of kids (it doesn’t matter, let’s say she had 38 children), and Chanah was despondent. God hears her pleas and grants her a son, Samuel, whom she “dedicates” to Temple service, meaning that when he’s old enough, he goes and lives at the Temple in Jerusalem, under the tutelage of the priest, Eli. Great. Fine. Lovely. Boarding School. Very Harry Potter; terrific.

Today, our Torah reading begins similarly. Sarah, married to Abraham, no kids, inconsolable. Abraham has a child with Sarah’s handmaiden, Hagar, which actually makes things WORSE. But God gets involved, angels come to visit, and they have a son, Isaac. All is right with the world. Then, somehow, we lose control of the steering wheel, our proverbial car careens off the road, and the “happily ever after” turns into a nightmare. God says (but not in so many words): “I gave you that son. You owe me. You need to offer him as a sacrifice on an altar back to me.” I shouldn’t say this from the Bimah… but “what the hell?!?” The logic is perverse, right??? You prayed for a son, I answered your prayers, so now as a sign of gratitude, kill the kid. 

Now we can offer all kinds of explanations for why God was never intending to go through with it, or it was just a test, or we simply don’t understand the depths of meaning and intention here, blah, blah, blah. This story makes me, anyway, deeply uncomfortable… and, quite frankly, mad at God. And this week, I read a two-sentence commentary by Rabbi Arthur Waskow, that offered new a new perspective. I thought it was just so terrific, that I wanted to share it with you. 

Waskow writes, so simply: “Seems to me that the rabbis’ choice of the story of Chana as the Haftarah [on the] 1st day Rosh Hashanah was a quiet rebuke of the Akedah [the Binding of Isaac]: to bring your child as an olah [for dedication], you don’t need to kill him or come even close. Do what Chana did, through prayer and steadfast chesed [righteousness], lift him to become a prophet.” I love this. In a sense, Waskow is suggesting incredible rabbinic chutzpah. When God conveys to Abraham, “you owe me,” Abraham is supposed to say “yes, AND…” My version is: You’re right, God. Abraham does owe you. We all do. We all should be incredibly grateful and appreciative of the blessings in our lives, and to know that joy, love, cuddling, closeness, and passing on our traditions from generation to generation - these are ALL phenomenal gifts. Buuuut, I’m not killing a child. That is NOT how I will show you my gratitude. Who talks like that to GOD?!? Oh yeah, we do. 

I also love this, because the rabbis NEVER outright criticize the Torah. God forbid! They just mandate that we read the story of Chanah FIRST, then the Akeidah, the Binding of Isaac, so that we might say to ourselves, “huh. That was an interesting choice. Why couldn’t Abraham just have done what Chanah did? Teach the boy how to love God, be a force for righteousness and goodness in our world, help some of the less-fortunate of God’s creations, and THAT can be the way you dedicate him TO God!!!” But the rabbis never SAY that… they just subtly lay that out there for us to see. Not for nuthin’... bad call, God. Just sayin’...

My commentary on that, and then we’ll jump into our Torah reading is, we all have to find this balance too. Yes, we DO have to educate our children, give them a sense of values, pride in the self and in our religion, and a commitment to justice, compassion, and fairness. But we cannot sacrifice our children on the altars of our own causes. And we do sometimes. People do… and we’re tempted to say “other” people, but it’s worth stopping and thinking about ourselves too. We don’t bind a child to a physical altar and raise a knife over our heads to do something unthinkable (though I’m told when you’re the parent of teenagers, the thought MAY cross your mind…). But there are other ways that we DO damage our kids, and other ways to challenge ourselves to be better partners WITH them, and work together to demonstrate shared gratitude to God for the gift of life, meaning, love, and commitment. 

As we begin our Torah reading, let’s all put Chanah (from yesterday) and Abraham (right here) on two ends of a spectrum, and spend some time figuring out where we, and our own values, could potentially fall somewhere between them. Just sayin’... Our Torah reading begins in the High Holiday Machzor, page 103.



Total Pageviews